<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why do Indians hate Slumdog Millionaire?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elekhni.com/2009/02/why-do-indians-hate-slumdog-millionaire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elekhni.com/2009/02/why-do-indians-hate-slumdog-millionaire/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:46:09 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rishab</title>
		<link>http://elekhni.com/2009/02/why-do-indians-hate-slumdog-millionaire/comment-page-2/#comment-9442</link>
		<dc:creator>Rishab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 07:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elekhni.com/?p=1203#comment-9442</guid>
		<description>Well most Indians hate the movie, cuz it Sucks. Not cuz of its depiction only. But its a story that has been overdone and the whole story lineup was a overkill of gargantuan proportions.
The story sucks. I have no problem with showing Slums.
Plus Dharavi is a wonder, its the only Slum that contributes 10% of a State&#039;s income and is self sufficient, plus its growing.
Not pretty but strangely Intriguing, thats Dharavi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well most Indians hate the movie, cuz it Sucks. Not cuz of its depiction only. But its a story that has been overdone and the whole story lineup was a overkill of gargantuan proportions.<br />
The story sucks. I have no problem with showing Slums.<br />
Plus Dharavi is a wonder, its the only Slum that contributes 10% of a State&#8217;s income and is self sufficient, plus its growing.<br />
Not pretty but strangely Intriguing, thats Dharavi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bad light stalls India&#8217;s progress &#171; Asianetindia.com Blog</title>
		<link>http://elekhni.com/2009/02/why-do-indians-hate-slumdog-millionaire/comment-page-2/#comment-3938</link>
		<dc:creator>Bad light stalls India&#8217;s progress &#171; Asianetindia.com Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 01:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elekhni.com/?p=1203#comment-3938</guid>
		<description>[...] Why do Indians hate Slumdog Millionaire? &#124; The Imagined Universe [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why do Indians hate Slumdog Millionaire? | The Imagined Universe [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: agni</title>
		<link>http://elekhni.com/2009/02/why-do-indians-hate-slumdog-millionaire/comment-page-2/#comment-2717</link>
		<dc:creator>agni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 03:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elekhni.com/?p=1203#comment-2717</guid>
		<description>when we compare the storyline in  vikas swarups Q &amp;A and boyles sdm
the first one is an indian perspective and the latter as western
in the former, the person taking the hero to the police is an american,
but boyle changed the storyline to suit his western audiences.
In the original the child is abused in a church, and his name contains all the religions.
Boyle just wanted to present a story in which the western couldnot shown in bad light</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when we compare the storyline in  vikas swarups Q &amp;A and boyles sdm<br />
the first one is an indian perspective and the latter as western<br />
in the former, the person taking the hero to the police is an american,<br />
but boyle changed the storyline to suit his western audiences.<br />
In the original the child is abused in a church, and his name contains all the religions.<br />
Boyle just wanted to present a story in which the western couldnot shown in bad light</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: purpleparrot</title>
		<link>http://elekhni.com/2009/02/why-do-indians-hate-slumdog-millionaire/comment-page-2/#comment-2716</link>
		<dc:creator>purpleparrot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elekhni.com/?p=1203#comment-2716</guid>
		<description>I think the movie was okay but very much over-hyped..because it didn&#039;t deserve ALL the awards it got...like Jai Ho is not that good a song if you compare it to A.R. rehman&#039;s previous music scores. Also the dance in the end was by far the crappiest I&#039;ve seen *pukes*. Okay the little kids were cute while dancing but the rest looked like idiots..and the dances in other movies are soo much cooler :)
I think people should not believe all they see in movies coz&#039; remember, if we go by what films show about america..it wouldn&#039;t exactly paint a pretty picture either..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the movie was okay but very much over-hyped..because it didn&#8217;t deserve ALL the awards it got&#8230;like Jai Ho is not that good a song if you compare it to A.R. rehman&#8217;s previous music scores. Also the dance in the end was by far the crappiest I&#8217;ve seen *pukes*. Okay the little kids were cute while dancing but the rest looked like idiots..and the dances in other movies are soo much cooler <img src='http://elekhni.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I think people should not believe all they see in movies coz&#8217; remember, if we go by what films show about america..it wouldn&#8217;t exactly paint a pretty picture either..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://elekhni.com/2009/02/why-do-indians-hate-slumdog-millionaire/comment-page-2/#comment-2715</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elekhni.com/?p=1203#comment-2715</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a European, and thought the film was ok. I completely agree it was not worth all those Oscars. It was a palatable, unchallenging film for the masses in the west - like an attempt to format bollywood elements in a hollywood structure. Novel idea, a bit formulaic and nothing too deep. There were MUCH better films around at the time. The hero and heroine were 2-dimensional, but it was a film made for popularity, not really for any deeper artistic reasons. There was some nice camera-work &amp; the basic idea was novel. Also, I wonder if the director will actually make a much deeper film about India in the future.

People in the west are not ignorant to the poverty in large rapidly developing cities throughout the world, nor do they really care about &#039;keeping india under their heel&#039;. Post-colonial countries are not under the illusion that they have much power now, because its all determined by economics and china and india are massive economic power-houses that lead to large numbers of job losses in the west. With more travel national identity is really beginning to dissolve and people are moving to where there is work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a European, and thought the film was ok. I completely agree it was not worth all those Oscars. It was a palatable, unchallenging film for the masses in the west &#8211; like an attempt to format bollywood elements in a hollywood structure. Novel idea, a bit formulaic and nothing too deep. There were MUCH better films around at the time. The hero and heroine were 2-dimensional, but it was a film made for popularity, not really for any deeper artistic reasons. There was some nice camera-work &amp; the basic idea was novel. Also, I wonder if the director will actually make a much deeper film about India in the future.</p>
<p>People in the west are not ignorant to the poverty in large rapidly developing cities throughout the world, nor do they really care about &#8216;keeping india under their heel&#8217;. Post-colonial countries are not under the illusion that they have much power now, because its all determined by economics and china and india are massive economic power-houses that lead to large numbers of job losses in the west. With more travel national identity is really beginning to dissolve and people are moving to where there is work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sumeet</title>
		<link>http://elekhni.com/2009/02/why-do-indians-hate-slumdog-millionaire/comment-page-2/#comment-2714</link>
		<dc:creator>Sumeet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 22:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elekhni.com/?p=1203#comment-2714</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t hate Slumdog just the Western paternalistic do-gooder mindset. Indians should have some self-respect and not behave in a fawning manner everytime Whitey speaks high of us. That isn&#039;t possible as long as English remains our national language. Unlike other Asian countries, India is still viewed as an ex-colony of Britain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t hate Slumdog just the Western paternalistic do-gooder mindset. Indians should have some self-respect and not behave in a fawning manner everytime Whitey speaks high of us. That isn&#8217;t possible as long as English remains our national language. Unlike other Asian countries, India is still viewed as an ex-colony of Britain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henrik</title>
		<link>http://elekhni.com/2009/02/why-do-indians-hate-slumdog-millionaire/comment-page-2/#comment-2713</link>
		<dc:creator>Henrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 02:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elekhni.com/?p=1203#comment-2713</guid>
		<description>As a European, I think this focus on stereotyping as a form of indirect subjugation is silly. People going to see the movie in Europe, North America, Australia etc will not be thinking quietly to themselves - &quot;haha, look how poor they are. They shall always be under our control&quot;. What nonsense. It was a very enjoyable, entertaining film which I felt captured the complexity and diversity of experience that is India and no way tried to paint the country in a negative light.

I think what makes Indians uncomfortable is that the image of poverty depicted in the film is not a fabrication - it is reality. The glass-sheeted modernity of modern, middle class India has to represent a maximum of 10% of the population.

Rough areas in Western cities are often depicted in American, British, French, Spanish movies etc. And you don&#039;t see the public raising hell about it? The problem is that there is a major inferiority complex on the part of India at the moment - which is quite understandable given the relative youth of India as a modern nation-state.

I say good luck to India in its development. If it works hard, develops itself over time, and begins to fix its cultural defects such as hypocrisy (Example: I met a number of Indian males while I was at Grad School in the US who had had sex with juniors at elite boarding schools (Doon, St Pauls) but were completely against gay rights etc), secrecy, caste-based forced marriage and corruption, it too can enjoy the standard of living that 90% of ordinary Europeans, Americans and Australians enjoy.

The key to prosperity is transparency - politically, economically and SOCIALLY. It is this third social aspect of advancement that India has yet to master.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a European, I think this focus on stereotyping as a form of indirect subjugation is silly. People going to see the movie in Europe, North America, Australia etc will not be thinking quietly to themselves &#8211; &#8220;haha, look how poor they are. They shall always be under our control&#8221;. What nonsense. It was a very enjoyable, entertaining film which I felt captured the complexity and diversity of experience that is India and no way tried to paint the country in a negative light.</p>
<p>I think what makes Indians uncomfortable is that the image of poverty depicted in the film is not a fabrication &#8211; it is reality. The glass-sheeted modernity of modern, middle class India has to represent a maximum of 10% of the population.</p>
<p>Rough areas in Western cities are often depicted in American, British, French, Spanish movies etc. And you don&#8217;t see the public raising hell about it? The problem is that there is a major inferiority complex on the part of India at the moment &#8211; which is quite understandable given the relative youth of India as a modern nation-state.</p>
<p>I say good luck to India in its development. If it works hard, develops itself over time, and begins to fix its cultural defects such as hypocrisy (Example: I met a number of Indian males while I was at Grad School in the US who had had sex with juniors at elite boarding schools (Doon, St Pauls) but were completely against gay rights etc), secrecy, caste-based forced marriage and corruption, it too can enjoy the standard of living that 90% of ordinary Europeans, Americans and Australians enjoy.</p>
<p>The key to prosperity is transparency &#8211; politically, economically and SOCIALLY. It is this third social aspect of advancement that India has yet to master.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riya</title>
		<link>http://elekhni.com/2009/02/why-do-indians-hate-slumdog-millionaire/comment-page-2/#comment-2712</link>
		<dc:creator>Riya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 02:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elekhni.com/?p=1203#comment-2712</guid>
		<description>I surmise,while Srinivas,Bored Indian are upset on patriotic basis,Vicharak slams it at an artistic level.Particle appreciates the way it forces us to look within ourselves for the rot that&#039;s there in any case.I relate to all perspectives about SM.

I live abroad and many Indians I know,including my spouse himself hate the movie for reasons like that of Srinivas &amp; Bored Indian. Though giving away so many Oscars to a very mediocre film did seem sinister to me initially,the reactions of Indians really surprise me.As Particle says we are in self-denial to some extent.Forget the Oscar.Who cares,anyway?Does it award
the best work each year.Pretty contentious. For instance,A R Rahman&#039;s music being awarded for this work seems a joke.That&#039;s a man whose work has outdone the SM work several times over before. Does everyone here endorse Oscars as the best test for quality movie-making?

Can we consider the Oscars as less significant in our patriotic lifes and focus on our work on breaking a sweat for reducing the corruption,poverty,religious divide,state divide and casteism?While India still is a beautiful in my eyes,I will not wither at anyone&#039;s portrayal of it,but that doesn&#039;t mean I will sleep on that belief either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I surmise,while Srinivas,Bored Indian are upset on patriotic basis,Vicharak slams it at an artistic level.Particle appreciates the way it forces us to look within ourselves for the rot that&#8217;s there in any case.I relate to all perspectives about SM.</p>
<p>I live abroad and many Indians I know,including my spouse himself hate the movie for reasons like that of Srinivas &amp; Bored Indian. Though giving away so many Oscars to a very mediocre film did seem sinister to me initially,the reactions of Indians really surprise me.As Particle says we are in self-denial to some extent.Forget the Oscar.Who cares,anyway?Does it award<br />
the best work each year.Pretty contentious. For instance,A R Rahman&#8217;s music being awarded for this work seems a joke.That&#8217;s a man whose work has outdone the SM work several times over before. Does everyone here endorse Oscars as the best test for quality movie-making?</p>
<p>Can we consider the Oscars as less significant in our patriotic lifes and focus on our work on breaking a sweat for reducing the corruption,poverty,religious divide,state divide and casteism?While India still is a beautiful in my eyes,I will not wither at anyone&#8217;s portrayal of it,but that doesn&#8217;t mean I will sleep on that belief either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bert</title>
		<link>http://elekhni.com/2009/02/why-do-indians-hate-slumdog-millionaire/comment-page-2/#comment-2711</link>
		<dc:creator>Bert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 15:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elekhni.com/?p=1203#comment-2711</guid>
		<description>Hello, yes, I am one of those people who reject Slumdog Millionaire [SM] completely. First of all India, as it is today, is a result of western colonialism in the recent past. Today&#039;s people in India probably embrace western values like riches, so they might sell everything to make money. That&#039;s ok with me. But what&#039;s not ok with me is that children at the age of 4 allready sell other&#039;s emotional belongings to profit themselves. At least, that is shown in SM. So SM suggest that even India&#039;s infants are morally corrupted. Why, because in SM they see no other example than grown ups who abuse children.

In my opinion, this is a shameless projection on India of the western world&#039;s own moral failure. Haven&#039;t we all heard of mass child abusement in the catholic church? Of the Dutroux&#039;s and Fritzl&#039;s terror cellars? Of the mentality &quot;those are not my children so why bother&quot;?

SM suggest that India&#039;s children are literaly willing to go through shit to get what they want. Well, it is us, western society, who does that, not literal because we have the power to stay &quot;clean&quot;.

Is the fun of seeing SM &quot;watching monkeys&quot; and afterwards going safely home in suburbia?

I don&#039;t believe that inhibitants of India&#039;s slums are child molestors. And if they are, they are no worst than we, after all, we created modern India. Or India has copied us, cuz they have no other option in world economics.

So when SM&#039;s protagonist finally gets what he is after, is that worth 100 minutes of terror against children? No, and this is defenitely not what I call balance.

I know cruelty against children exists in this world. What I oppose to is that this problem is used in pop video clip style to be able to sell it to the unaware public. We recognize the fast images, digitally captured in blinding brilliant colors and livelyness. It&#039;s our language telling a story that is thankfully not ours. WRONG, it is sadly our own story.

Underneath mister Danny Boyle&#039;s fast cut piece of India lies colonialism and discrimination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, yes, I am one of those people who reject Slumdog Millionaire [SM] completely. First of all India, as it is today, is a result of western colonialism in the recent past. Today&#8217;s people in India probably embrace western values like riches, so they might sell everything to make money. That&#8217;s ok with me. But what&#8217;s not ok with me is that children at the age of 4 allready sell other&#8217;s emotional belongings to profit themselves. At least, that is shown in SM. So SM suggest that even India&#8217;s infants are morally corrupted. Why, because in SM they see no other example than grown ups who abuse children.</p>
<p>In my opinion, this is a shameless projection on India of the western world&#8217;s own moral failure. Haven&#8217;t we all heard of mass child abusement in the catholic church? Of the Dutroux&#8217;s and Fritzl&#8217;s terror cellars? Of the mentality &#8220;those are not my children so why bother&#8221;?</p>
<p>SM suggest that India&#8217;s children are literaly willing to go through shit to get what they want. Well, it is us, western society, who does that, not literal because we have the power to stay &#8220;clean&#8221;.</p>
<p>Is the fun of seeing SM &#8220;watching monkeys&#8221; and afterwards going safely home in suburbia?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe that inhibitants of India&#8217;s slums are child molestors. And if they are, they are no worst than we, after all, we created modern India. Or India has copied us, cuz they have no other option in world economics.</p>
<p>So when SM&#8217;s protagonist finally gets what he is after, is that worth 100 minutes of terror against children? No, and this is defenitely not what I call balance.</p>
<p>I know cruelty against children exists in this world. What I oppose to is that this problem is used in pop video clip style to be able to sell it to the unaware public. We recognize the fast images, digitally captured in blinding brilliant colors and livelyness. It&#8217;s our language telling a story that is thankfully not ours. WRONG, it is sadly our own story.</p>
<p>Underneath mister Danny Boyle&#8217;s fast cut piece of India lies colonialism and discrimination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Srinivasa</title>
		<link>http://elekhni.com/2009/02/why-do-indians-hate-slumdog-millionaire/comment-page-2/#comment-2710</link>
		<dc:creator>Srinivasa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 23:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elekhni.com/?p=1203#comment-2710</guid>
		<description>Congratulations! You have now (un)officially written the weirdest perspective on the movie! lmao!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations! You have now (un)officially written the weirdest perspective on the movie! lmao!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
